vaccine advocacy
-
Here I tear down all the arguments in the book, Vaccines, amen.
-
Much of what they say would fail a college level science course. Lets see why that is.
-
Why the recent Mccullough et al 2025 paper is wrong on COVID vaccine myocarditis.
-
The article \”‘Spikeopathy’: COVID-19 Spike Protein Is Pathogenic, from Both Virus and Vaccine mRNA\”, by Parry et al, is filled with mistakes, logical errors, and outright falsehoods. It’s like a compilation of all the pandemic antivax talking points rolled into one. Take homes: 1. You may not invent your own logic to prove a point…
-
In this blog post I wrap up the last few chapters, and share where Geehr and Barke’s logical mistakes are. For a summary, jump to the bottom.
-
In this chapter we see how Barke and colleagues got it wrong on the rotavirus, pneumococcal, hepatitis A, polio, haemophilus, and chickenpox vaccines.
-
The book authors try to grade six vaccines, and fall over themselves making mistake after mistake doing so.
-
Del Bigtree’s colleagues get it wrong again in trying to describe kids vaccines.
-
While it is true that chickenpox disease (varicella) is mild for most people, this particular document contains enough distortions to make the unsuspecting user minimize varicella (a consistent tactic throughout these PIC group documents). In rare situations, varicella can be fatal. Most fatal cases of varicella occur in adults age 20 or older.4 While this…
-
The theme of the PIC publications continues with minimization of the disease and maximization or obfuscation of vaccine side effects. Duplicate points in this set of two information sheets from PIC are only addressed once.
Frank Han's Cardiology Corner 